Funding API

Funding signals as a sales trigger

A company that just closed a raise has budget it did not have last quarter. The filing that says so is public, dated, and carries no contact data to govern.

The problem

Territory lists go stale. The accounts worth calling this month are the ones that just raised, and that fact is sitting in a public filing rather than in the list your team is working.

Announcements are late and incomplete

News coverage skews to the rounds somebody wanted covered. The filing obligation does not.

A raise is not a raise

A debt facility, an equity round and a fund's own capital call all arrive as Form D filings and mean entirely different things to a seller.

Lists built on scraped contacts age badly

And they carry a governance problem that has nothing to do with whether the signal was any good.

The request

One call

GET /funding/v1/filings
  ?state=TX
  &sector=Other%20Technology
  &min_amount=10000000

Filter on security_types to separate an equity round from a debt facility, and on date_of_first_sale when recency matters more than the filing date.

entity_name

The issuer, as a business name.

state_or_country

The issuer's own address block, for territory routing.

industry_group

The filer's checkbox. Useful, but read the caveat above.

total_amount_sold_usd

The dated amount that makes the trigger credible to a rep, with the filing attached so it is not a guess.

filed_at

When it became public, which is the date the trigger should carry.

source_url

The filing. This is what turns a lead list into an auditable one.

The first 3 rows that call returns

Live, newest first

Filed	Issuer	Industry	State	Investors	Amount	Source
2026-07-15	DataBahn, Inc. \DE	Other Technology	TX	10	$35.0M	↗
2026-06-12	Niural, Inc.	Other Technology	TX	11	$20.6M	↗
2026-06-09	Curiosities Inc.	Other Technology	TX	5	$10.4M	↗

What to know before you build on it

There is no contact data on this product. No names, no emails, no phone numbers, and none derived. That is a deliberate boundary and it is also the reason there is nothing here to govern under a privacy regime.
You will need your own entity resolution to match an issuer to an account. Form D carries no domain, and guessing one is worse than leaving it unmatched.
Amounts are cumulative across amendments, so import originals or handle the restatement.
Refreshed daily rather than in real time, with several Form D passes a day. Poll on your own schedule; there is no alerting and no webhook delivery.
Whatever you do with the signal afterwards is subject to your own jurisdiction's rules on commercial messages. The filing being public says nothing about that.

Recent technology raises →

Common questions

Can I get contact details with the funding data?

No. This product is business-level only: issuer name, amounts, industry, state, security types and the filing link. There is no contact data on it and none is derived from it.

How do I match a Form D issuer to a company in my CRM?

With your own entity resolution, keyed on the issuer name and state. The filing carries no domain and no ticker, so there is no identifier that maps cleanly on its own.

Try it

Run this query against the live data before you decide.

The playground calls the real endpoint and shows the real response body, filters included. A free key needs no card and covers both products.

Open the playground